03/29/2014

NEXT POST
UNEP Development The opposite in the way of production and consumption of still effective the economic development, the model of sustainable development consists of satisfying the necessities gifts, without compromising the capacity of the future generations to supply its proper necessities, generating wealth and well-being with the climatic changes are one of the most complex, multifaceted and serious threats that the world faces. The reply to this threat she is on, basically, to the concerns with the sustainable development and a world just; with the vulnerability and the resilience; economy, reduction of the poverty and society; with the world that we want to leave for our children We cannot continue in this direction for much time. We cannot continue in this standard. The time arrived for a decisive action, in global scale (Ban, 2007 apud UNEP, 2008, p.31). Yes, we can and need Beyond the diverse ambient problems and from the challenges to guarantee the availability of natural resources, to respect limits of the biosfera and to reduce the poverty, the world suffers two great threats in the present time, that are the global heating and the world-wide crisis of the economy. > current crisis in the economy increases the importance to acquire knowledge the population to pressure the elites leading to count, definitively, with environment as ally and more the opposite, as it has been, not to exaurir it as to an enemy. The technological progress decides problems of the environment, but it is not enough, she is necessary to invest in the awareness of all the sectors the world-wide society to revitalize the fabric social and to recriar bows of harmonic interaction with the corporeal properties. ' ' The efficient use of the land, water, energy and other natural resources assists in sustainable ways of life, it becomes the companies...
PREVIOUS POST
New Delhi Chaotic, because we have a hypersensitive to the variations system, even though they are small, which indicates that the chaos underlies that paradoxically leads to the conclusion that it is not in a mess but before the genesis of an order. The complexity increases the chance of a given organization that happens to reside the emerging creativity, so that there is no possibility of repetition of mimicry or cloning, since the fractalizarse society generates a creative iteration in the local. In other words, the thesis of the single thought is an a loss left trasnocho. The global context, per, requires multiple voices. The thesis of the single thought proposes that this should be imposed, since it is not generated spontaneously. The question is: how imposing it on an increasingly complex society? We are still at the stage of technological advancement. Munne reminds us that just we are entering in change of intangible culture, what I've dubbed the slowness in the advancement of the ideas. The market does not establish traditions because in essence is derived from an obsolescence, as neither can create societal links or engender social innovation. The image of the MacDonald at each corner would lead us to ask, for example, that ingredients or seasonings or adaptations suffers from hamburger to suit Indian taste in that venue in the Centre of New Delhi. The presence of that establishment in the India is that indicated the existence of a transnational company that sells certain types of food, not a construction of senses. Which ensures human progress is a dialectic of cultures. This global navigation of goods has, therefore, a limited effect, but within that limitation edit behaviors, as we have noted, from the workplace to the manner of exercising it, since changes in the old family until changes in...

Recent Comments